A Court Divided: The Rehnquist Court and the Future of Constitutional Law
Search in google:
"An incisive consideration of the Supremes, offering erudite yet accessible clues to legal thinking on the most important level."—Kirkus Reviews The Washington Post - Dahlia Lithwick Whether, as Tushnet contends, the court is divided into old and new Republicans, into conservatives, liberals and swingers, into pragmatists and idealists, or into lovers of firm rules or squishy standards, the fact is that the Supreme Court is human, not divine. It need not be feared, bound or gagged in order to play out its constitutional role. A Court Divided goes a long way toward illuminating that truth.
1William Rehnquist's court132Two kinds of republican493Clarence Thomas's constitution714Ruth Bader Ginsburg's equal protection clause1045Antonin Scalia's first amendment1306Anthony Kennedy and gay rights1567The religious right's agenda - symbols and money1808Holding the line on abortion2049Race, affirmative action, and crime22310The federalism revolution24911The takings project27912Big business's constitution30213A Supreme Court united?319
