This is a study of the interrelationships between the formulary traditions of the legal documents of the Jewish colony of Elephantine and the legal formulary traditions of their Egyptian counterparts. \ The legal documents of Elephantine have been approached in three different ways thus far: first, comparing them to the later Aramaic legal tradition; second, as part of a self-contained system, and more recently from the point of view of the Assyriological legal tradition. However, there...
The legal documents of Elephantine have historically been approached in three different ways. Firstly, in comparison with later Aramaic traditions. Secondly, as part of a self-contained system, and more recently from an Assyriological standpoint. Alejandro F. Botta presents a fourth possible approach, through examination of the Egyptological background.
List of TablesCh. 1 Introduction: The Egyptological Approach to the Study of Aramaic Legal Formulae 1Ch. 2 The Elephantine Community and Aramaic Law 8Ch. 3 The Egyptian Formulary Tradition 72Ch. 4 Challenging the Consensus: the [actual symbol not reproducible] Clause 81Ch. 5 The 'Withdrawal' and Related Formulae in the Aramaic Legal Tradition 96Ch. 6 The Use of [actual symbol not reproducible] in the Egyptian Legal Tradition 137Ch. 7 A Comparison of the Aramaic and Egyptian Uses of Withdrawal Formulae 180Ch. 8 Reconsidering the Origins of Aramaic and Demotic Legal Formulae 199Works Cited 204Index 235