Impossible Women: Lesbian Figures and American Literature
Impossible Women fills a critical gap in queer theory by spotlighting representations of lesbian sexuality in nineteenth- and twentieth-century American literature. Reading through the lens of feminist and psychoanalytic theory, Valerie Rohy considers texts by Nathaniel Hawthorne, Kate Chopin, Henry James, Zora Neale Hurston, Ernest Hemingway, and Elizabeth Bishop.Addressing American ideologies of reproduction and representation, Impossible Women suggests that lesbian figures are made to...
Search in google:
AcknowledgmentsviiIntroduction: Reading Impossibility11The Romance of the Real: The Blithedale Romance and The Bostonians132The Reproduction of Meaning: Language, Oedipality, and The Awakening423Modernist Perversity: The Repetition of Desire in The Sun Also Rises654Oral Narratives: "Race" and Sexuality in Their Eyes Were Watching God915Love's Substitutions: Elizabeth Bishop and the Lie of Language117Conclusion144Notes151Index185
\ From the Publisher"Impossible Women is ideal for Americanists looking to integrate queer studies into their teaching and study of canonical works."-Frann Michel, Willamette University. MFS: Modern Fiction Studies, Vol. 47, No. 4, 12/01\ "Impossible Women is the first book I know that brings lesbian theory to bear on the canonical works of American literature. Finding lesbian sexuality in places we may not have thought to look for it, Rohy's wickedly clever book shows how figures of female perversity haunt our national literature. A thoughtful, articulate, and convincing book."-Diana Fuss, Princeton University, author of Identification Papers\ "Impossible Women is brilliantly written and clear, a narrative intent on driving its reader to the core of arguments and to the end of the book, sure to become one of the seminal critical texts of the field."-Linda Wagner-Martin, Hanes Professor of English, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill\ "Impossible Women brings into productive conversation two fields of scholarly inquiry often kept separate from each other: literary history (and canonicity) and feminist/lesbian criticism and politics. Impressively written and researched, it deserves the attention-and appreciation-of both fields. An engaging and important book."-Nicole Tonkovich, University of California, San Diego\ \ \
